Sep 16, 2024… You could be facing some challenges today. When something important in your life is in conflict with harmony, it can be very uncomfortable and troubling for your sensitive Aries soul. Consider what it would take to restore balance… even if it’s something difficult to do, like ending a habit or routine that isn’t working in a positive way. Once you’re willing to change direction and lift yourself up, you may find that the rest just falls into place.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
Sep 16, 2024… You could feel a pull to get someone back into your life today, Aquarius. It might have been that epic romance you left behind or even your best friend from the third grade. The energy will be great for reaching out and restoring ties and mending fences. Has someone been on your mind? If you go in without expectation and offer nothing but a chance to reconnect, you might just find that they have been thinking of you, too.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
Sep 16, 2024… You could feel a pull to get someone back into your life today, Aquarius. It might have been that epic romance you left behind or even your best friend from the third grade. The energy will be great for reaching out and restoring ties and mending fences. Has someone been on your mind? If you go in without expectation and offer nothing but a chance to reconnect, you might just find that they have been thinking of you, too.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
Sep 16, 2024… You could feel a pull to get someone back into your life today, Aquarius. It might have been that epic romance you left behind or even your best friend from the third grade. The energy will be great for reaching out and restoring ties and mending fences. Has someone been on your mind? If you go in without expectation and offer nothing but a chance to reconnect, you might just find that they have been thinking of you, too.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
Sep 16, 2024… You could feel a pull to get someone back into your life today, Aquarius. It might have been that epic romance you left behind or even your best friend from the third grade. The energy will be great for reaching out and restoring ties and mending fences. Has someone been on your mind? If you go in without expectation and offer nothing but a chance to reconnect, you might just find that they have been thinking of you, too.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
A Pennsylvania judge has removed Cornel West from the state’s ballot, raising the stakes for third-party candidates.
Commonwealth Court Judge Renee Cohn Jubelirer ruled against independent presidential candidate Cornel West’s attempt to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot. The ruling was based on the finding that West’s campaign did not submit required affidavits for 14 of his 19 presidential electors. According to the Secretary of State’s office, these affidavits are essential for validating the electors’ commitment and eligibility.
The decision came in the context of broader legal efforts by both major parties to challenge or support third-party candidates. The Nov. 5 election in Pennsylvania, a battleground state with 19 electoral votes, is expected to be hotly contested, contributing to the heightened scrutiny and legal challenges.
Court rules Cornel West can’t be on ballot in Pennsylvania https://t.co/U0sy3aCjGs
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 25, 2024
West’s lawyer, who has prior associations with Republican candidates, has not disclosed whether an appeal to the state Supreme Court will be filed. This leaves West’s future in Pennsylvania uncertain, mirroring similar challenges his campaign faces in other states.
West is not alone in facing legal hurdles. Independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has already announced his withdrawal from Pennsylvania’s ballot and is suspending his presidential bid to support President Trump. The Green Party’s Jill Stein and the Libertarian Party’s Chase Oliver successfully submitted petitions to get on Pennsylvania’s ballot without challenge.
Meanwhile, the Party for Socialism and Liberation plans to appeal a judge’s decision that removed its candidate, Claudia De la Cruz, from the state’s ballot. Pennsylvania Democrats successfully contested this attempt, citing that seven of the party’s 19 presidential electors were registered Democrats, violating the state’s political disaffiliation laws. As Democratic Party-aligned lawyer Adam Bonin noted, “They literally voted in the Democratic primary and then turned around to try to be electors for a third-party candidate. You can’t do that.”
The complexities of the electoral system and the challenges faced by independent candidates like Cornel West underscore the procedural hurdles in achieving ballot access. The judge’s ruling emphasizes the stringent regulations that third-party candidates must navigate, often more rigorous than those faced by major-party candidates.
The outcome of West’s potential appeal, along with the ongoing ballot challenges in other states, will be critical not just for his campaign but also for the broader discourse on electoral fairness and the viability of third-party candidates. As the election date approaches, the decisions made in Pennsylvania and other key states will likely have lasting implications on the political landscape.
| " | " | “ | Quotation Mark |
| & | & | & | Ampersand |
| / | / | / | Slash |
| < | < | < | Less Than Sign |
| > | > | > | Greater Than Sign |
| ‚ | ‚ | ‚ | Single Low-9 Quote |
| „ | „ | „ | Double Low-9 Quote |
| — | — | — | Em dash |
| — | – | – | En dash |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | Per Mill Sign |
| ‹ | ‹ | ‹ | Single Left Angle Quote |
| ‘ | ‘ | ‘ | Left Single Quote |
| ’ | ’ | ’ | Right Single Quote |
| “ | “ | “ | Left Double Quote |
| ” | ” | ” | Right Double Quote |
| ™ | ™ |  |
Trademark Symbol |
| › | › | › | Single Right Angle Quote |
|   | | Non Breaking Space | |
| ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | Inverted Exclamation Point |
| ¢ | ¢ | ¢ | Cent Sign |
| £ | £ | £ | Pound Sterling |
| ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | General Currency Sign |
| ¥ | ¥ | ¥ | Yen Sign |
| ¦ | ¦ | ¦ | Broken Vertical Bar |
| § | § | § | Section Sign |
| ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | Umlaut (Dieresis) |
| © | © | © | Copyright Symbol |
| ª | ª | ª | Feminine Ordinal |
| « | « | « | Left Angle Quote, Left Guillemet |
| ¬ | ¬ | ¬ | Not Sign |
| ­ | ­ | | Soft Hyphen |
| ® | ® | ® | Registered Trademark |
| ¯ | ¯ | ¯ | Macron, Overline |
| ± | ± | ± | Plus or Minus |
| ² | ² | ² | Superscript Two |
| ³ | ³ | ³ | Superscript Three |
| ´ | ´ | ´ | Acute Accent |
| º | º | º | Masculine Ordinal |
| » | » | » | Right Angle Quote, Right Guillemet |
| • | • | • | Bullet / Black Small Circle |
| … | … | … | Horizontal Ellipsis |
| ′ | ′ | ′ | Prime / Minutes / Feet |
| ″ | ″ | ″ | Double Prime / Seconds / Inches |
| ‾ | ‾ | ‾ | Overline |
