Feedspress is a versatile and user-friendly WordPress plugin that allows you to easily display customizable RSS feeds on your website. This powerful tool is designed to give you complete control over the way your RSS feeds are displayed, with built-in shortcodes that allow you to customize the look and feel of your feeds to match your website’s design and branding.
Nov 29, 2023… The pathway to spiritual connection will be wide open for Aries to explore today. Look for better connections to information as well as to people — even plants and animals. The mid-week brings warm vibes and a feeling that everything is right with the universe. This will be a fantastic vibe to either passively relax and rejuvenate your soul, or actively seek deeper connections in your relationships.
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Former President Donald Trump is the likely nominee of the Republican Party for the presidential race next year. In order to make that official, he has to win the primary race. He can only do that if he’s on the ballot. A judge recently ruled in his favor after an effort to keep him off of the Michigan ballot.
On November 14, a Michigan judge thwarted an effort to keep Trump off the ballot in the primary race. Plaintiffs argued he was ineligible to be president again because of the insurrection clause in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. The clause states that anyone who “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” while in office is ineligible to hold that seat again. The clause was put into the Constitution to prevent members of the Confederacy from holding office.
Judge James Robert Redford ruled that disqualifying a candidate using the 14th Amendment “is a nonjusticiable, political issue” that should only be settled by Congress. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson supported the decision by the court. The plaintiffs in the case are now appealing the ruling to the Michigan Supreme Court.
Trump won a similar lawsuit earlier in the month in Minnesota. Like this one, plaintiffs argued that he should be disqualified because of his behavior after the 2020 election. However, the state Supreme Court determined they had no jurisdiction over whether his name appeared on the Republican Party’s ballot to choose their candidate.
There’s another case to keep Trump off of the ballot in Colorado. Again, the plaintiffs are using the insurrection clause. Like the other cases, this one is unlikely to succeed. A judge in New Hampshire dismissed a similar case.
Trump’s enemies continue to try to keep him from returning to the White House and picking up where he left off.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
| " | " | “ | Quotation Mark |
| & | & | & | Ampersand |
| / | / | / | Slash |
| < | < | < | Less Than Sign |
| > | > | > | Greater Than Sign |
| ‚ | ‚ | ‚ | Single Low-9 Quote |
| „ | „ | „ | Double Low-9 Quote |
| — | — | — | Em dash |
| — | – | – | En dash |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | Per Mill Sign |
| ‹ | ‹ | ‹ | Single Left Angle Quote |
| ‘ | ‘ | ‘ | Left Single Quote |
| ’ | ’ | ’ | Right Single Quote |
| “ | “ | “ | Left Double Quote |
| ” | ” | ” | Right Double Quote |
| ™ | ™ |  |
Trademark Symbol |
| › | › | › | Single Right Angle Quote |
|   | | Non Breaking Space | |
| ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | Inverted Exclamation Point |
| ¢ | ¢ | ¢ | Cent Sign |
| £ | £ | £ | Pound Sterling |
| ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | General Currency Sign |
| ¥ | ¥ | ¥ | Yen Sign |
| ¦ | ¦ | ¦ | Broken Vertical Bar |
| § | § | § | Section Sign |
| ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | Umlaut (Dieresis) |
| © | © | © | Copyright Symbol |
| ª | ª | ª | Feminine Ordinal |
| « | « | « | Left Angle Quote, Left Guillemet |
| ¬ | ¬ | ¬ | Not Sign |
| ­ | ­ | | Soft Hyphen |
| ® | ® | ® | Registered Trademark |
| ¯ | ¯ | ¯ | Macron, Overline |
| ± | ± | ± | Plus or Minus |
| ² | ² | ² | Superscript Two |
| ³ | ³ | ³ | Superscript Three |
| ´ | ´ | ´ | Acute Accent |
| º | º | º | Masculine Ordinal |
| » | » | » | Right Angle Quote, Right Guillemet |
| • | • | • | Bullet / Black Small Circle |
| … | … | … | Horizontal Ellipsis |
| ′ | ′ | ′ | Prime / Minutes / Feet |
| ″ | ″ | ″ | Double Prime / Seconds / Inches |
| ‾ | ‾ | ‾ | Overline |
