Feedspress is a versatile and user-friendly WordPress plugin that allows you to easily display customizable RSS feeds on your website. This powerful tool is designed to give you complete control over the way your RSS feeds are displayed, with built-in shortcodes that allow you to customize the look and feel of your feeds to match your website’s design and branding.
Nov 29, 2023… The pathway to spiritual connection will be wide open for Aries to explore today. Look for better connections to information as well as to people — even plants and animals. The mid-week brings warm vibes and a feeling that everything is right with the universe. This will be a fantastic vibe to either passively relax and rejuvenate your soul, or actively seek deeper connections in your relationships.
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
Nov 29, 2023… You can be launched into high spirits today, Aquarius. A simple reconnection with a friend could take you there. Who have you been wondering about but haven’t had a chance to call? You’re probably on their mind as well, so reaching out can really liven up your day. Will you make the first move as Aquarius so often do? How about a quick text message to open the door? Reach out, and watch your spirits soar!
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley has made a radical suggestion to fight online extremism — but it’s also a huge violation of personal privacy. Haley recently said anonymous social media users are a threat to our security, and she wanted them banned. Now, she’s having second thoughts.
On November 14, Haley, a former governor of South Carolina who also served as the US Ambassador to the United Nations under the Trump Administration, told Fox News that anonymous accounts on social media platforms are a “national security threat” and called for all users to have their identity verified. She said this was necessary to prevent hostile states like Russia, China, or Iran from whipping up anti-Semitism online through misinformation. If users had their identity verified, she said, they would “have to stand by what they say,” and it would neutralize bots run by rogue states. She added that “you’re gonna get some civility” when people know their pastors and families will be able to link them with what they say online.
Haley’s suggestion didn’t go down well with some of her fellow Republicans, though. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis pointed out that the authors of the Federalist Papers were writing anonymously, and called Haley’s suggestion “dangerous and unconstitutional.” Others joined in. Turning Point USA chief Charlie Kirk said anonymity is “a core part of free speech,” while conservative radio host Dana Loesch said she was “a million percent against” this level of government control. Even tech billionaire Elon Musk weighed in, saying Haley “can stop pretending to run for president now.”
In the face of this opposition, Haley has partly backed down from her statements. On November 15, she said she didn’t object to Americans having anonymous accounts, but didn’t believe foreigners should be able to. In other words, a presidential candidate wants to make a law for everyone in the world except the one country our government can actually make laws for — this one.
Copyright 2023, UnitedVoice.com
| " | " | “ | Quotation Mark |
| & | & | & | Ampersand |
| / | / | / | Slash |
| < | < | < | Less Than Sign |
| > | > | > | Greater Than Sign |
| ‚ | ‚ | ‚ | Single Low-9 Quote |
| „ | „ | „ | Double Low-9 Quote |
| — | — | — | Em dash |
| — | – | – | En dash |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | Per Mill Sign |
| ‹ | ‹ | ‹ | Single Left Angle Quote |
| ‘ | ‘ | ‘ | Left Single Quote |
| ’ | ’ | ’ | Right Single Quote |
| “ | “ | “ | Left Double Quote |
| ” | ” | ” | Right Double Quote |
| ™ | ™ |  |
Trademark Symbol |
| › | › | › | Single Right Angle Quote |
|   | | Non Breaking Space | |
| ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | Inverted Exclamation Point |
| ¢ | ¢ | ¢ | Cent Sign |
| £ | £ | £ | Pound Sterling |
| ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | General Currency Sign |
| ¥ | ¥ | ¥ | Yen Sign |
| ¦ | ¦ | ¦ | Broken Vertical Bar |
| § | § | § | Section Sign |
| ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | Umlaut (Dieresis) |
| © | © | © | Copyright Symbol |
| ª | ª | ª | Feminine Ordinal |
| « | « | « | Left Angle Quote, Left Guillemet |
| ¬ | ¬ | ¬ | Not Sign |
| ­ | ­ | | Soft Hyphen |
| ® | ® | ® | Registered Trademark |
| ¯ | ¯ | ¯ | Macron, Overline |
| ± | ± | ± | Plus or Minus |
| ² | ² | ² | Superscript Two |
| ³ | ³ | ³ | Superscript Three |
| ´ | ´ | ´ | Acute Accent |
| º | º | º | Masculine Ordinal |
| » | » | » | Right Angle Quote, Right Guillemet |
| • | • | • | Bullet / Black Small Circle |
| … | … | … | Horizontal Ellipsis |
| ′ | ′ | ′ | Prime / Minutes / Feet |
| ″ | ″ | ″ | Double Prime / Seconds / Inches |
| ‾ | ‾ | ‾ | Overline |
