Feedspress is a versatile and user-friendly WordPress plugin that allows you to easily display customizable RSS feeds on your website. This powerful tool is designed to give you complete control over the way your RSS feeds are displayed, with built-in shortcodes that allow you to customize the look and feel of your feeds to match your website’s design and branding.
May 4, 2024… A good chat with a close friend could be just what you need to warm your soul today. Has it been a while since you’ve connected with a loved one, Aries? You can use this warm and friendly vibe as an opportunity to do so if you’re up for it. Reach out and start something you can have fun with! It can bring a little extra excitement to your day.
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
May 4, 2024… You will likely get unexpected inspiration from someone today. You likely have passions and ideas of your own, but someone else has just the right stuff to give your mind an inspirational jumpstart today. Observing the way they express themselves can evoke strong feelings in you, Aquarius. This experience could also help you share with them, too.
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
May 4, 2024… You will likely get unexpected inspiration from someone today. You likely have passions and ideas of your own, but someone else has just the right stuff to give your mind an inspirational jumpstart today. Observing the way they express themselves can evoke strong feelings in you, Aquarius. This experience could also help you share with them, too.
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
May 4, 2024… You will likely get unexpected inspiration from someone today. You likely have passions and ideas of your own, but someone else has just the right stuff to give your mind an inspirational jumpstart today. Observing the way they express themselves can evoke strong feelings in you, Aquarius. This experience could also help you share with them, too.
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
May 4, 2024… You will likely get unexpected inspiration from someone today. You likely have passions and ideas of your own, but someone else has just the right stuff to give your mind an inspirational jumpstart today. Observing the way they express themselves can evoke strong feelings in you, Aquarius. This experience could also help you share with them, too.
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
(UnitedVoice.com) – “Ghost guns” are untraceable, unregistered firearms made by people in their homes, either with a kit or a 3D printer. Websites offer all kinds of kits from AK-47s to handguns. President Joe Biden’s administration cracked down on the guns, but a federal court ruled the new regulation was unlawful. The Supreme Court will now hear the federal government’s appeal.
On April 22, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the appeal. The decision came after an earlier 5-4 ruling by the justices allowed the restrictions on the weapon to go into effect after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the regulations were unlawful.
In 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued a regulation expanding the definition of “firearm” to include unfinished parts, like the receiver of a rifle or the frame of a handgun. The change would make it easier to track the firearms because they must now have serial numbers and be licensed. Manufacturers must also run a background check before selling the weapons, just like they do with firearms made commercially.
Second Amendment advocates and companies sued the ATF and argued the new regulation wasn’t legal. Judge Reed O’Connor, from the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas, ruled in favor of the gun activists and struck down the expansion of the definition. He stated that “a weapon parts kit is not a firearm” and something that’s “converted to a functional receiver is not itself a receiver.”
A three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit upheld O’Connor’s ruling. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt wrote the opinion in that ruling, stating that Congress had not updated the definition under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Because the change had not gone through the legislature, the judges determined the ATF regulation was unlawful.
Solicitor General Elizabeth B. Prelogar appealed the ruling to the SCOTUS, arguing that the Fifth Circuit’s ruling would create a “flood of untraceable ghost guns into our nation’s communities.”
Copyright 2024, UnitedVoice.com
| " | " | “ | Quotation Mark |
| & | & | & | Ampersand |
| / | / | / | Slash |
| < | < | < | Less Than Sign |
| > | > | > | Greater Than Sign |
| ‚ | ‚ | ‚ | Single Low-9 Quote |
| „ | „ | „ | Double Low-9 Quote |
| — | — | — | Em dash |
| — | – | – | En dash |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | Per Mill Sign |
| ‹ | ‹ | ‹ | Single Left Angle Quote |
| ‘ | ‘ | ‘ | Left Single Quote |
| ’ | ’ | ’ | Right Single Quote |
| “ | “ | “ | Left Double Quote |
| ” | ” | ” | Right Double Quote |
| ™ | ™ |  |
Trademark Symbol |
| › | › | › | Single Right Angle Quote |
|   | | Non Breaking Space | |
| ¡ | ¡ | ¡ | Inverted Exclamation Point |
| ¢ | ¢ | ¢ | Cent Sign |
| £ | £ | £ | Pound Sterling |
| ¤ | ¤ | ¤ | General Currency Sign |
| ¥ | ¥ | ¥ | Yen Sign |
| ¦ | ¦ | ¦ | Broken Vertical Bar |
| § | § | § | Section Sign |
| ¨ | ¨ | ¨ | Umlaut (Dieresis) |
| © | © | © | Copyright Symbol |
| ª | ª | ª | Feminine Ordinal |
| « | « | « | Left Angle Quote, Left Guillemet |
| ¬ | ¬ | ¬ | Not Sign |
| ­ | ­ | | Soft Hyphen |
| ® | ® | ® | Registered Trademark |
| ¯ | ¯ | ¯ | Macron, Overline |
| ± | ± | ± | Plus or Minus |
| ² | ² | ² | Superscript Two |
| ³ | ³ | ³ | Superscript Three |
| ´ | ´ | ´ | Acute Accent |
| º | º | º | Masculine Ordinal |
| » | » | » | Right Angle Quote, Right Guillemet |
| • | • | • | Bullet / Black Small Circle |
| … | … | … | Horizontal Ellipsis |
| ′ | ′ | ′ | Prime / Minutes / Feet |
| ″ | ″ | ″ | Double Prime / Seconds / Inches |
| ‾ | ‾ | ‾ | Overline |
